Oh no, the two threads have become meshed!
> From: K1TTT@ARRL.NET
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:06:22 +0000
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of wire mesh...
>
> THIS thread is about the galvanized wire fence used to enhance a vertical
> antenna ground screen. There is a different thread(simply titled 'Wire
> Mesh') talking about the welded concrete reinforcement mesh.
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger (K8RI) [mailto:K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net]
> > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 23:55
> > To: Tower and HF antenna construction topics.
> > Cc: n4zr@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of wire mesh...
> >
> > I think this conversation is covering two types of wire mesh. One is
> > the light to medium weight galvanized. The other that is used for
> > concrete reinforcement is much heavier, made up of 1/4" rods and welded
> > at each cross junction and there is no coating on it. At least that is
> > what went into my driveway. There is a lighter version made of 1/8" rod
> > as well. Properly installed I don't see why it wouldn't work well in
> > the concrete for a tower base. Be it re-rod or heavy mesh it's only
> > real purpose is to keep the concrete from breaking. It basically floats
> > within the concrete and junctions are usually nothing more than light
> > weight steel wire of about #16 in size that serves to hold the separate
> > pieces of re-bar in place.
> >
> > I have one of the old, detailed catalogs with lots of engineering
> > information, but as we are getting ready to remodel the den/ham shack I
> > only know it's stored in some box, some where in the basement.
> >
> > IOW I can not vouch that they did or did not refer to the heavy mesh in
> > the catalog.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Roger (K8RI)
> >
> > Wes Attaway (N5WA) wrote:
> > > When placed on, or below, dirt galvanized wire rusts away pretty fast
> > here
> > > in Louisiana. After a year or two I wouldn't want to be depending on it
> > for
> > > anything important. Using copper wire might seem more expensive, but
> > when
> > > everything is considered I doubt that it would be.
> > >
> > > ------------------ Wes Attaway (N5WA) ------------------
> > > 1138 Waters Edge Circle - Shreveport, LA 71106
> > > 318-797-4972 (office) - 318-393-3289 (cell)
> > > Computer Consulting and Forensics
> > > -------------- EnCase Certified Examiner ---------------
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> > > [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of jimlux
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:13 PM
> > > To: Tower and HF antenna construction topics.
> > > Cc: n4zr@contesting.com
> > > Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Speaking of wire mesh...
> > >
> > > K1TTT wrote:
> > >
> > >> They may not be perfect, but they do help. I use that stuff under my
> > 80m
> > >> 4-square... even with the radials raised up 10' putting 150' of that
> > stuff
> > >> under each vertical was still a measurable change to the impedance when
> > I
> > >> was putting up the first one and testing it. I got it in 100' sections
> > >>
> > > from
> > >
> > >> a local fence installer and put 100' out from the center of the 4-
> > square
> > >>
> > > as
> > >
> > >> far as it went past each vertical, then a 50' piece at 90 degrees to it
> > >> crossing at the base of each vertical. A 1/8" galvanized cable clamp
> > does
> > >>
> > > a
> > >
> > >> good job of clamping without need for matching metals if you use
> > >>
> > > galvanized
> > >
> > >> wire, then use a bigger galvanized clamp to attach to the tower rung.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > > The question I would have is whether you'd be better spending money on
> > > copper wire for radials than spending it on steel mesh. Obviously, if
> > > one has a cheap source for either, than that might push you one way or
> > > the other.
> > >
> > > For tesla coils, which are entirely a near field thing (100-200 kHz),
> > > mesh works great, but there, it's because the mesh makes a more uniform
> > > electrostatic field.. the advantage is in the field shape more than the
> > > loss effects. The mesh is basically one plate of a capacitor.
> > >
> > > But for antennas, I'm not so sure.
> > >
> > > However, it occurs to me that this is something that NEC4 can model
> > > (albeit tediously), except for the permeability of the wires.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TowerTalk mailing list
> > > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TowerTalk mailing list
> > > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|