Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipoles

To: "Tower Talk List" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipoles
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:45:08 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:29:19 -0500, Ian Hill - K8MM wrote:

>Vertical dipoles are good low band antennas.

Hold on a minute -- I think we are talking about very different 
antennas. :) I have a top-loaded vertical (some would call it a 
monopole) for 160M that works a treat, but it is not a DIPOLE. It's 
an 86 ft vertical wire with a horizontal piece on top to bring it to 
resonance, and it works against radials (to carry the current and 
provide a path for the fields). 

A vertical half wave DIPOLE behaves VERY differently from a vertical 
monopole. The top half and bottom half of a vertical dipole both 
radiate, and together form a complete antenna. The vertical part of 
a monopole needs radials (or a counterpoise) to form a complete 
antenna, and to the extent that they are symmetrical, the radiation 
from the radials cancells in the far field. 

73,

Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>