Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Cable working load/breaking strength...///

To: Bill Winkis <kc4pe@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cable working load/breaking strength...///
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:41:17 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Bill Winkis wrote:
> *Here is what the folks at Amtec are saying... I use there cable grips...
> *
> 
> *The broad application of AMTEC Grips on a wide variety of objects 
> requires that adequate safety factors be used to establish a safe 
> working load. The ratio of the listed approximate breaking strength to 
> the normal working load is the safety factor. As an example, a safety 
> factor of ten (10) would then mean that the working load is established 
> by dividing the catalog listed approximate breaking strength by ten 
> (10), or it can be stated that the working load is 1/10 of the catalog 
> listed approximate breaking strength.*
>


Yep.. that's sort of what I was thinking..

each designer chooses what they want to use as a safety factor for each 
application.  It covers things like material property uncertainty (e.g. 
was it a slightly not so good batch of steel), installation issues 
(certainly an issue for something like grips, which I can imagine would 
vary greatly in ultimate strength depending on application technique and 
how clean the cable is, etc.), or environmental factors (are you using 
it in a salt spray environment).

So, if you want to know what the mfr (or designer) thought they were 
asking for, the best plan is to ask them.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>