To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower |
From: | "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:52:41 -0500 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
> Any idea how close to salt water a vertical > dipole array has to be to work well? I'm pretty sure the exhaustive series in the NCJ stated the benefit as a function of distance from the water expressed in wavelength, i.e. it's a function of frequency. Zero distance is best, and it drops off pretty fast as you get away from the water. Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Ham Radio family electrocuted, Steve Katz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower, Paul Christensen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower, David Gilbert |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Not QUITE a tower, Charlie Gallo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |