Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] GAP Voyager question

To: <KI9A@aol.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] GAP Voyager question
From: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:55:53 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
All the GAPs are really center-fed, and the "radials" at the base are really 
just end loading the bottom radiator section; there's separate top loading for 
the upper radiator section.

Try adding more wires; I found it didn't really make any difference, but 
probably couldn't hurt.

WB2WIK/6

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of KI9A@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:56 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] GAP Voyager question


Gentleman, ( and Ladies),
 
I have a GAP Voyager 20-160 vertical up, had it about 2 years now.  It  
really outperforms my 135' open wire fed dipole @ 40', past 1500 miles, ( 80, 
40  meters) and I enjoy it...plus, it gets me on 160. even worked 2 JA's this 
winter  from Illinois.
 
Here is the question. It is every hams intent to make an antenna  better.  
What is the purpose of the 3 - 56' "radials" on these antennas?  And, 
conventional wisdom says if these 3 are needed to make it function, would  more 
be 
better??? 
 
73- Chuck KI9A
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd
=JulystepsfooterNO115)
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>