Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?

To: Tower Talk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?
From: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 08:20:13 +0200
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
A quarter wave vertical is better then a Inv L. So, yes.

Henk PA5KT

Michael Almeter schreef:
> Hello All,
>     I've got a question, concerning the inverted L antenna. In all the books 
> I've found, it states that one wants the vertical section "As high as 
> possible". If one had a 133' tree or tower, would it just be wise to run all 
> the wire vertically, instead of vertically and horizontally?
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Mike Almeter
> W4MJA
>   


-- 
Henk Remijn PA5KT
email: pa5kt@remijn.net
www: www.remijn.net

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>