Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline ?

To: Chad WE9V <chad.we9v@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline ?
From: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:01:01 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Chad WE9V wrote:

>Or a less expensive source of un-uns, the UN-75 at $50:
>http://www.cwsbytemark.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=206_214
>If you've read any of the W2FMI books, you know this is capable of handling
>much more than the 1KW claimed.  And if you're a little handy, just wind
>your own for the price of a $8 core (F-150A-K) and some connectors and box.
>
>Chad WE9V
>
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>At $85 a pop this may be the may be the cheapest solution on a "time is
>>money basis". It has fewer connections to waterproof than the
>>asynchrounous transformer solution and doesn't suffer from the bandwidth
>>problems of the multiple of a 1/2 wave line scheme. Which solution is
>>best depends on the particular circumstances. It is an interesting
>>system design problem.
>>
>>73, Mike W4EF..........
>>
>>
>>    
>>
Hey Chad,

I am not familiar with the innards of the Array Solutions Un-un, so I 
suppose its possible that it is the same design as the Byte Mark W2FMI 
Un-un. Seems like a product comparison of various Un-uns with some QRO 
testing to see how they each handle power and mismatch would make a good 
NCJ or QST article.

73, Mike W4EF......................



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>