Chad WE9V wrote:
>Or a less expensive source of un-uns, the UN-75 at $50:
>http://www.cwsbytemark.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=206_214
>If you've read any of the W2FMI books, you know this is capable of handling
>much more than the 1KW claimed. And if you're a little handy, just wind
>your own for the price of a $8 core (F-150A-K) and some connectors and box.
>
>Chad WE9V
>
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>At $85 a pop this may be the may be the cheapest solution on a "time is
>>money basis". It has fewer connections to waterproof than the
>>asynchrounous transformer solution and doesn't suffer from the bandwidth
>>problems of the multiple of a 1/2 wave line scheme. Which solution is
>>best depends on the particular circumstances. It is an interesting
>>system design problem.
>>
>>73, Mike W4EF..........
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hey Chad,
I am not familiar with the innards of the Array Solutions Un-un, so I
suppose its possible that it is the same design as the Byte Mark W2FMI
Un-un. Seems like a product comparison of various Un-uns with some QRO
testing to see how they each handle power and mismatch would make a good
NCJ or QST article.
73, Mike W4EF......................
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|