Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole alternatives

To: <john@kk9a.com>, <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole alternatives
From: "Bill Aycock" <baycock@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: Bill Aycock <baycock@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:29:15 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <john@kk9a.com>
To: <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole alternatives


> W4HV informed me that DX Blaster 80m cage dipole uses 1 meter spreaders.
> These spreaders are much larger than the cage dipole example in the ARRL
> Antenna book so the 400 KHz bandwidth claim is very possible without
> feedline looses.
>
> John KK9A
>
I don't think the bandwidth he claims is in question. It's the gain claims.
An earlier visit to  his site showed spreaders for sale. They are not there 
now. I wonder why, and if they would sell some, anyway?
Bill-W4BSG 


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>