Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC- needs improvement

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC- needs improvement
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:10:28 +0200
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Sure it does, at about -3,8dbi of gain.
Above all other ground except above saltwater the dipol will outperform the
vertical in its broadside direction

73
Peter 

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Hunt
Sent: Montag, 6. April 2009 19:51
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC- needs improvement

Paul,

I'm sorry I've failed to convince you. I'll now leave it for others to judge
whether or not a dipole with your published elevation response will respond
to signals arriving at 5 degrees!

73,
Steve G3TXQ

Paul Playford wrote:
> The dipole (at 1/2 wavelength above ground) will have a higher angle 
> of radiation (more F layer hops for DX) than the vertical, both over 
> salt water.
>
> Anytime you add F layer hops to a path you will have increased loss.
>
> I have already spent too much time on this subject, I am done with it.
>
> de Paul, W8AEF
>
> ZF2JI/ZF2TA  FO8DX/FO8PLA  8Q7AA  XZ0A  VU7RG  TX5C
>
>   

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>