I can take a hint. Enough said... -Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Portable
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 1:30 AM
To: 'TowerTalk'
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas and Property Value responsa
Steve,
You were worried about a few PayPal posts, once realtors get going there is
no stopping them:-)
Mike
-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas and Property Value responsa
You are exactly right here. If want something done right do it yourself.
Before I would buy another property ANYWHERE, I would do my homework. And
when it comes down to writing a contract to purchase, I would have an
addendum placed in the contract that gives adequate time ( 30 days or so )to
do your due diligence. I have written these a dozen times for people who
want to buy property ( for example ) along a busy road but want to be sure
they can do with it what it is they want. For example put a certain type of
business there that needs multiple driveways for ingress/egress, or will
have an undground or above ground storage tank or the will look into whether
they can have a deep water well on the property.
They do their homework and so should you. - Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of RICHARD SOLOMON
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 1:03 AM
To: TowerTalk
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas and Property Value responsa
Then you get the Realtor who lists a property with no deed restrictions and
after writing a check for the down payment you get 19 pages of CC&R's in
the mail. Just because they have a license means nothing unless you do your
due diligence. Bottom line, trust no one.
73, Dick, W1KSZ> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:31:59 -0800> From:
jimlux@earthlink.net> To: mryan001@tampabay.rr.com> CC:
towertalk@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas and Property
Value responsa> > Michael Ryan wrote:> > Ken, Having two licenses would not
be a CONFLICT of INTEREST in an of> > itself. That's a pretty broad
statement you've made here. If there is a> > transaction in which a licensed
or multi licensed individual is involved,> > where his expertise or
performances is called into play and where he may be> > asked to call on his
expertise in his other profession, he must be careful,> > and at the very
least DISCLOSE to all concerned his dual nature. A conflict> > would not
occur unless that person is engaged in a transacition performing> > BOTH the
duties he is licensed to perform. In that case he is BOUND to> > disclose
and in such a case it is prudent to avoid any suggestion of> > impropriety,
in decling one or even BOTH sides of or involvement in the>
> transaction. But just having two licenses would not be a conflict of> >
interest. - Mike, K4CVL> > > >> "bound to disclose"?> Not necessarily. It
might be ethical to disclose, but it might not be > legally required. This
is one of those caveat emptor things that > provides ample employment for
attorneys. For instance, NAR might > require certain ethics of a REALTOR(R),
but if you don't follow their > rules, the worst they can do is throw you
out of the organization (and > maybe fine you, but they'd probably have to
sue to collect...).. that > is, it's not "illegal" to not follow NAR's
ethics rules.> > However, for some licensed professions, it is actually
illegal to do > unethical things (e.g. it's not only unethical, but illegal
for me to do > engineering work for which I am not competent or qualified).>
> > > _______________________________________________> > > >
_______________________________________________> TowerTalk mailing list>
TowerTalk@contesting.com> http://lis
ts.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
__________ NOD32 3837 (20090208) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.19/1941 - Release Date: 02/09/09
06:50:00
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
__________ NOD32 3837 (20090208) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|