Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] trylon 72 foot tower

To: <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] trylon 72 foot tower
From: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:34:40 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
A sloping dipole, especially at a reasonable height, is a very good antenna. 
Some refer to a 1/4 wire as a sloper.  Since the tower radiates in this 
configuration, results will vary a lot.

John KK9A


To: "Tower Talk List" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] trylon 72 foot tower
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:36:04 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:22:45 -0700, Mike Fatchett W0MU wrote:

>Getting slopers to work well is almost like finding True North.

For a short time, I ran a sloping dipole for 40, 80, and 160 that
was suspended from a massive 150 ft AT&T microwave tower on a 3,000
ft mountaintop near Sacramento. It played REALLY well. During a 160M
contest, I could work anything I could hear with 100 watts, and I
could hear really well. I suspect that the QTH and the significant
reflection provided by the tower (I'd guess 3dB or so of additional
gain in the favored direction) had a lot to do with it.

73,

Jim K9YC 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>