OK... so, I am guessing this is why the fellow asked the original
question about how those two types of antennas were working out
in real life, where all the all those variables would be working their
magic, and having respective impacts, depending on the location.
Of course, such anecdotal stories would be of only limited use
and not necessarily applicable to other locations and other situations
which would have their own, respective variables playing out. But it
would be at least another clue, even if not conclusive. And I kinda
thought the original poster had tried to say he was doing both the
modeling AND asking about real life results.
Just MY take. I has all been very informative and interesting to this
novice operator.
Thanks for the uptake and Happy Trails / 73. /// K8JHR ///
========================================================
K4SAV wrote:
> Those numbers I gave don't include all those variables. Some of the
> variables like ground quality were included as a average value. Those
> last models do not include all the possible variables because I don't
> know what each person has. Once you know that, then the model can be
> modified to include those other items.
> Knowing what items effect the performance and when those items should be
> included into the model
========================================================
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|