Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Two questions (buried coax)

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Two questions (buried coax)
From: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:30:51 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
A SteppIR control cable sitting in water will degrade over time.  If it
develops any amount of inner conductor to ground leakage, it will take the
driver chips right out.
I went through that exact thing last year.  It was my stupid mistake.

John
Wa5zup

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Ogden
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 7:46 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Two questions (buried coax)

FWIW, I had lots of water in a buried conduit for several months (without
knowing it).  Something prompted me to pull a rag through and it came out
soaked.  I connected a shopvac, in reverse mode, and blew a fountain of
water out the far end of the conduit.  I had three coax runs, one relay
control (5 wires), and one SteppIR control cable in the conduit.  AFAIK,
everything was working correctly despite of the water.  I just did not like
the idea of the cables lying in water indefinitely.  (Also, I could barely
pull a rag through the 2" conduit and could not remove or add another
cable.)  So I dug it up and replaced it with 4" conduit, with a better
slope, drain holes, etc, etc.

Did I need to do anything?  I don't know........maybe all would have worked
correctly indefinitely sitting in water in the conduit.

Bill - W2WO

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>