Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ Hygain verses Original Hygain

To: chris@g3vbl.co.uk
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ Hygain verses Original Hygain
From: Salvatore Console <k2qmf@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:14:57 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hello Chris,

Just wondering why you say that the MFJ versions are a joke???

Thanks in advance for your input...

73,
Ted  K2QMF
 
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:13:10 +0000 Chris Pedder <chris@g3vbl.co.uk>
writes:
> If you really mean the original Hygain Long John monobanders (c. late 
> 
> 1960s) then the MFJ versions, and the later Hygain ones for that 
> matter, are a joke.
> 
> The originals were very rugged indeed!
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> At 00:10 30/12/2007, Bob wrote:
> >Folks,
> >
> >I've seen comments from people indicating that Hygain
> >antenna products are poorer quality since MFJ took over
> >Hygain.  I have original Hygain Long John monobanders and
> >the MFJ/Hygain versions appear to be the same when looking
> >through the manuals.
> >
> >What specifically, has suffered quality-wise with the MFJ
> >versions of the Hygain monoband Yagis?
> >
> >TIA, Bob K6ZZ
> >
> >_
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 
 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>