Except that Jim did exactly what he said he did: he ran a qualitative
power-handling test of some capacitors he had on hand. He apparently
instrumented only one value, RF power on the source end, and he "pumped"
that through the capacitors. He reported a qualitative measurement of
their power-handling capability - they got warm. He probably doesn't
know exactly what the current was, but we can infer that the Z and
system Q were low because he had previously described the sort of
antenna he was trying to match. Semantics, pedantics - he certainly
described the experiment well enough for this old RF engineer to
understand ;-)
73,
geo - n4ua
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Martin Ewing - AA6E
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:57 PM
> To: Tower Talk List
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Capacitors To Tune 160 Vertical
>
> Let me jump in with a pet peeve. I know Jim knows better, but there
are
> few components that know or care how much power is "pumped through"
> them, although people often speak as if they did.
>
> Capacitors, inductors, coax, switches, and what-have-you have voltage
> and current ratings, but not "power" -- unless referred to a specific
> impedance. They would have power _dissipation_ ratings, but that's a
> different number.
>
> In this case, it's the capacitor's current rating that is in question.
> Your 1 kW is 4.5 A @ 50 ohms, but it might be 3.2 A @ 100 ohms, or
> whatever. Same idea applies to voltage ratings. A corollary: A
> component (switch, ferrite, etc) that handles 1 kW into 50 ohms (VSWR
> 1.0) may not handle 1 kW with VSWR 2.0.
>
> Sorry to interrupt the proceedings with such pedantics!
>
> 73 Martin AA6E
>
> Jim Brown wrote:
> > ... I began with two .0047 400V dipped micas in
> > series, and pumped 1 kW through them for a few minutes. They got
> > warm, as one would suspect, but no sign of overheating.
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|