ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:31:43 -0500, "Gary Schafer"
<garyschafer@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>Sometimes these alternatives are all that can be done at a particular site
>but they are not "single point ground systems" and should not be called
>such.
------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
My point exactly. In English, the word "single" has a specific
meaning. If you have more than one ground point but you use the word
"single", you are confusing the issue. There is nothing wrong with
saying "Double Point Ground" or "Multiple Point Ground" or "Multiple
Ground Points".
Please call it what it is.
Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|