Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 4-square separation

To: Steve Sala <k7awb@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 4-square separation
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:37:57 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You should model your system on EZNEC.  It is surprising
how much interaction there is even at 100-200 ft spacing.
Unless you have lots of land, you will want to detune
the 80 meter antennas when you are on 40.  What I do with
mine is break up the 80 meter antenna with an insulator
at the 30 ft level and use a relay to short out the insulator
only when on 80.  This makes the 80m vertical completely
invisible on 40.

Rick N6RK

Steve Sala wrote:
> I am planning both a 40-meter and 80-meter four square next year in my back 
> field.  I am mowing the field this month to stake out the potential area.  I 
> do not want to put the 40 meter inside the 80 meter area, but put them side 
> by side, both on a line East to West so the 4 corners are 45 degrees, 135 
> degrees, 225 degrees, and 315 degrees for best overall to Europe and Japan 
> from Eastern WA.  What is the spacing I should make between the edges of each 
> array for no interaction.  Any information would be appreciated.    
> 
> 73
> Steve Sala
> K7AWB
> DN17es
> Nine Mile Falls, WA
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>