Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 Question

To: john@kk9a.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 Question
From: "Dick, W1KSZ" <w1ksz@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:59:34 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I'm beginning to regret I even asked the question ...

73, Dick, W1KSZ

john@kk9a.com wrote:
> What is not registering is why you are claiming that adding a second bearing 
> reduces rotator failure.  What is the theory?
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
> To: <john@kk9a.com>; <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 Question
> 
> 
> 
>   If there is such a reduction in rotator failure using this method,
>> why are you so concerned about making it easier to replace them.
>>
>> KK9A
> 
> 
> Rotators have to be removed when the mast has to be dropped to replace,
> repair or add antennas. I dont care for climbing the mast and I like
> stability when I'm lowering and raising.
> 
> And I'll repeat myself if it didnt register the first time. Ive never had a
> binding issue with dual bearings nor know of anyone first hand that has.
> 
> Carl
> KM1H 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

-- 
73, Dick, W1KSZ
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>