Carl,
You gotta be kidding. How boorishly lazy and self-centered can you
possibly be. It's total crap that only 1% of the people who follow this
reflector can think in metric. Besides, you're familiar with, for
example, the 80m and 40m bands, right? You think maybe we should be
calling them the "260 foot band" and "130 foot band"?
Dave AB7E
jeremy-ca wrote:
> Then I suggest that you and others who like to make believe that you are
> scientists form your own metric oriented forum.
> I KNOW how to convert when I have to but I have absolutely no intention of
> doing it in relation to something on a ham forum that is 99% oriented to USA
> members.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 1:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] How tall is that tower?
>
>
>
>> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:58:09 -0400, jeremy-ca wrote:
>>
>>
>>> How about translating that into feet whch is still a USA measurement
>>> standard?
>>>
>> How about working to try get your head around meters, which is a WORLD
>> standard, especially for scientists? :) That shouldn't be too tough --
>> a meter is not quite 10% more than a yard.
>>
>> 73,
>> Jim K9YC
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|