To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's |
From: | "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 06 Jul 2007 02:15:45 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Even "remote" doesn't come with any gurantees. Purchase 20 acres, set up a remote with antenna farm, developer sells land around you, large group of fancy homes go up, form a HOA of which you aren't a member. Soooo....they don't like the looks of the antennas. Even though you were there first they file a lawsuit. It's happened to many airports already. With time and money you'd probably prevail and get your money back...maybe, but they can make it inconvenient and expensive for the moment, maybe years. Then as it's a remote location "things can happen". I have heard stories about HOA's in new developments trying to bully older residents on adjacent property into "voluntarily" joining, but anyone would be a fool to do that. And if you are not a member of the HOA and everything about your antennas and towers was legal before they set up shop, what grounds would they have for a suit? I'd tell them to go fly a kite! (probably in words not that polite) The important thing is that you avoid HOA and CC&R controlled communities which usually means avoiding anything build since the early 70's. Many of the nicest communities around here were built before then. It's really annoying to me that hams that want antennas are being forced into older neighborhoods and can't buy in new developments or newer cities, but that's the way it is. Welcome to the Sweet Land of Liberty!! A more likely scenario is that more hams will be required to use club stations. W6YX and N6IJ are two really good club stations within an hour or so of here. N6IJ is even planning to support remote operation one of these days. That sounds exactly like amateur radio in the old Soviet Union. I used to listen to Radio Moscow back in the 50's and 60's. They would sometimes describe amateur radio in the USSR. First, you had to take out a "listening licence" in order to SWL. Then once you became licensed to transmit, you usually operated from a club station. There were very few individual ham stations located in personal residences. Many aspects of life in USA are getting to be more and more like it was reported to be in that country we were taught to be afraid of in the 50's. I'm glad I live out in the country on 100 acres, where no-one can tell me what antennas I can or cannot erect on my own property. I have a 127' base insulated tower that I use as a quarter wave vertical on 160, complete with an extensive buried radial ground system. Also have a 110' high 80m dipole. The shack is outside in an old one-room schoolhouse I had moved onto the property. My only antenna restrictions are to stay out of the way of the farmer that I lease cropland to. One positive thing I could say about the Soviet amateurs was that operator and technical competence were high. Most stations, down to the receiver, were homebrew. We need more of that here. 73, Don k4kyv _________________________________________________________________ Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!? http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_hotmailtextlink2 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Comtek boxes, WZ8P |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Comtek boxes, Tim Duffy K3LR |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Copper, WarrenWolff |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's, Alan NV8A |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |