Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RF current meter

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RF current meter
From: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Reply-to: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:41:31 +0100
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
K4SAV wrote:
>The thing that surprised me when looking at the designs others have 
>done was that many people used the clamp-on ferrites that are intended 
>for RFI suppression.  These add a large series impedance into what you 
>are trying to measure and will mess up the current you are trying to 
>measure.

It is important to terminate the secondary winding with a low-value 
resistor. If you do, then even an RFI suppression bead will act as a 
transformer with a very low insertion impedance in the main line. For 
example, if a 10-turn secondary is terminated in 47 ohms, the insertion 
impedance in the main line is theoretically 0.47 ohms; and in practice 
it is only a few ohms.

If you leave the secondary with a high-impedance load, *then* you will 
see the full insertion impedance of the ferrite bead. (A simple 
impedance meter like the MFJ-259B will show this effect quite well.)


-- 

73 from Ian GM3SEK         'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>