| To: | <k3lr@k3lr.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Yagiis |
| From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Jun 2007 22:48:25 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
> There is no decrease in gain by using a OWA design. I have > carefully modeled the > OWA vs. conventional low impedance feedpoint designs. The > only draw back to the > OWA is one additional element for a given boom length > (this close spaced 1st > director creates a 50 ohm feedpoint impedance for direct > feeding and great VSWR > bandwidth - nothing more). The gain and F/B bandwidth are > not changed by the use > of the OWA feed system design. > Hi Tim, The OWA article says they give up gain. http://www.naic.edu/~angel/kp4ao/ham/owa.html What software are you using? My Eznec 5 sure doesn't handle tapered elements well. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Yagiis, Tom Rauch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3, David Gilbert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Yagiis, Tim Duffy K3LR |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Yagiis, Tim Duffy K3LR |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |