Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] One DB

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] One DB
From: "James C. Garland" <4cx250b@muohio.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:18:59 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hi Dave, I don't see why his test is flawed.  Seems pretty creative 
to me. Your suggestion probably woudn't yield consistent results 
because of QSB.

Jim W8ZR

At 05:57 PM 5/29/2007, you wrote:
>I think your efforts should be rewarded but the test is flawed.
>
>Try using QRP and an attenuator.  Get a distant station to record the two
>transmissions...one with and one without the 1db attenuator in the output.
>
>73,
>dave
>wa3gin@COMCAST.NET
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
>[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Gilbert
>Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:19 PM
>To: Bob Houf at Comcast; CADXA; TowerTalk; Brian MacHunter
>Subject: [TowerTalk] One DB
>
>
>Someone on the Towertalk reflector recently asked whether an additional
>one db of antenna gain was worth pursuing.  The answer, of course, was
>that it all depends...
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

*************************
Jim Garland
Santa Fe, NM
www.w8zr.net
************************* 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>