Joe responded (actually shouted) this statement after I stated the following
last Friday night when comparing the subject antennas: "The SteppIR, has no
element interaction problems because the element lengths are adjustable,
however the spacing is not adjustable and not optimum", Since no limits
were defined, I understood his comment to mean that within the frequency
range of the SteppIR, the element spacing is irreverent. If this is
incorrect, then Joe, W4TV, is actually agreeing with me, that the element
spacing of the SteppIR is not optimum on all bands.
John KK9A
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR
From: Bill Turner
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:31:38 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 11:18:05 -0400, <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
>ELEMENT SPACING DOES NOT ENTER INTO EITHER GAIN OR F/B IF THE ELEMENTS ARE
>PROPERLY TUNED FOR THEIR POSITION IN THE ARRAY??
------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
The statement above was originally posted by W4TV and prefaced by
"within limits". By removing "within limits" you have made it into an
absolute statement instead of a relative one, something Joe did not
intend.
Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|