To: | "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Flexible coupler assembly |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:44:57 -0800 (PST) |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
>>Another thought on the subject: It may be more convenient to mount the >> shock >>absorber under the rotor between the tower and rotor. > I bought a used tower with an M2 rotor installed in it. It had a rubber shock mount system under the rotor. The rubber was all beat up and falling apart. I asked M2 about it, and they said that was kind of a failed experiment because the rubber only lasted 6 months. They said forget about it and go back to a rigid mount. I am wondering about these rubber donut things: how well does the rubber hold up in the sun? They never see UV in a car. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Flexible coupler assembly, Jim Lux |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Third Order Intercept, Tony |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Flexible coupler assembly, Jim Lux |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Flexible coupler assembly, Gary Schafer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |