Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower inspection failed for not having antennas! -PASSED

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower inspection failed for not having antennas! -PASSED!
From: "Gary - N3JPU" <n3jpu@speakeasy.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:22:30 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
This time it passed. The inspector said he did not see the antenna mast as
was shown on the drawings. Although it could be argued I just simply put the
mast up there and he passed it.

Gary Mitchelson
N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD  FM19
USAF MARS and SHARES: AFA1PU
MD/DC State USAF MARS Director AFF1MD
USAF MARS Technical Services Manager AFN1TS 
http://www.mitchelson.org/ 


-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of kb5my@starband.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 16:50
To: n3jpu@speakeasy.net
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower inspection failed for not having antennas!



> I had my new Heights Tower 61' tower inspected today for it's "Final 
> Inspection" (which states that it must be done before "occupancy"), 
> and found a note today that the inspector failed it! He said it was 
> incomplete because there was no antennas installed on it!
>
> Of course the approved building plans and permits do not have any 
> antennas listed, and I take the term "occupancy" to mean antennas in 
> this case.
>
> The footing inspection was a snap, as well as getting the permit, but 
> now I am in a battle on this BS.
>

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>