To: | "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Shortened Antennas for 160 |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:26:56 -0800 (PST) |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
crawfish wrote: > There are a couple of guys advertising shortened 160m antennas on QTH want > ads all the time.Quite sure they use loading coils. > Joe W4AAB Do yourself a favor and use top loading wires. I simply fasten the top loading wires to the top set of guy ropes using "ty-raps" (use the black UV proof type). You can eliminate or reduce the loading inductance this way, plus you get the radiation resistance up, which means less ground loss. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] HF Vertical Opinions NEEDED..., Mike (K6BR) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] HF Vertical Opinions NEEDED..., WA3GIN |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Shortened Antennas for 160, crawfish |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Broadcast Band Interference, mryan001 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |