To: | "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vee vs. Dipole QRN |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Sat, 4 Nov 2006 23:34:16 -0800 (PST) |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
> I would agree that there's a lot of manmade noise about, it's the > assertion that it's *predominantly vertically polarized* that I'm > curious about. Local manmade noise may start out randomly polarized. However, only the vertically polarized component can propagate by ground wave. This is well known physics. The horizontal component is rapidly attenuated with distance. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Questions about Irrigation Pipe for Verticals, Pat Chiles |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vee vs. Dipole QRN, Jim Lux |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vee vs. Dipole QRN, Jim Lux |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vee vs. Dipole QRN, Jim Lux |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |