To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 304 vs 316 Stainless Steel for Mast |
From: | "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:50:00 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
It's not worth getting the 316. 304 holds up fine; I've seen pieces left outside for years with no corrosion. Even in a marine environment, honestly, I'd expect the salt spray would eat four antennas before it took out your 304SS mast, though I've not witnessed saltwater corrosion of 304 myself. 73, Dan _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] N CONNECTORS, Craig Clark |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 304 vs 316 Stainless Steel for Mast, Larry Kirkland |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 304 vs 316 Stainless Steel for Mast, Andrew Roos |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 304 vs 316 Stainless Steel for Mast, Larry Kirkland |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |