Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RF saftey

To: "Darrel J. Van Buer" <darrel@vanbuer.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RF saftey
From: Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:54:29 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You're right and, as usual, I am wrong. "Often wrong but never in doubt."

My apologies to the list.

Again, back to towers




At 09:48 10/12/2006, you wrote:
>Note that microwaves are NOT ionizing radiation.  You don't get 
>ionization until you get into ultraviolet (which is
>why it contributes to skin cancer).
>The hazards from RF are absorption causing heating or high induced 
>voltages.  Microwaves are the most effectively absorbed.
>  Darrel AK6I
>Craig Clark wrote:
>
>>The key is you are talking about microwaves not HF signals and the 
>>difference is ionizing versus no ionizing radiation.
>>
>>back to tower contruction..................................
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>73, Craig Clark, K1QX
>>
>>
>>RADIOWARE AND RADIO BOOKSTORE
>>PO  BOX 209
>>RINDGE NH 03461
>>603 899 6957
>>WWW.RADIO-WARE.COM
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Darrel J. Van Buer, AK6I
>darrel@vanbuer.net

73, Craig Clark, K1QX


RADIOWARE AND RADIO BOOKSTORE
PO  BOX 209
RINDGE NH 03461
603 899 6957
WWW.RADIO-WARE.COM



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>