Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] B & W Antenna( was 2006 top ten)

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] B & W Antenna( was 2006 top ten)
From: Larry Phipps <larry@telepostinc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:13:37 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I recently read that, Joe. L.B. confirmed my assumptions, but it's nice 
to see a somewhat rigorous treatment. Do you know if the SGC broadband 
dipole is basically the same design?

Larry N8LP
www.telepostinc.com
"Home of the groundbreaking LP-100 Digital Vector Wattmeter"




Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> W4RNL has done his usual excellent job modeling and studying the 
> "wideband folded dipole" (e.g., "the B&W Antenna").  See his 
> web page at: http://www.cebik.com/wire/wbfd.html.  The quick 
> take away from his work is that a 90' WBFD is between 3 and 7  
> dB worse than a simple 90' doublet fed with open wire line and 
> a suitable tuner at frequencies above 6 MHz.  Below 6 MHz the 
> losses in the WBFD increase significantly to the point that the 
> WBFD is down some 24 dB at 2 MHz.  
>
> 73, 
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV 
>  
>   
>
>
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com 
>> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of James 
>> P. Cassidy
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:16 PM
>> To: TOWERTALK REFLECTOR
>> Subject: [TowerTalk] B & W Antenna( was 2006 top ten)
>>
>>
>> At the risk of being fatally flamed I want to add a couple 
>> cents worth to
>> the B & W Antenna issue.  
>>
>> I had read the same info for many years about the 
>> ineffectiveness of the B
>> & W antenna.  This past spring I operated at a station that 
>> uses one and
>> was slightly amazed at the performance.  No, its not a world 
>> beater contest
>> antenna but did work well enough in the CQ WPX SSB contest to 
>> work quite a
>> few stations on 160,80 and 40m.  There was no other antennas for those
>> bands to compare with but the main point is that it did 
>> radiate well enough
>> for some QSOs. Of course in the contest situation there was 
>> no accurate
>> signal reports and its very likely that the signal was below that of a
>> conventional dipole.
>>
>> The bottom line was that the station was capable of making contacts.
>>
>> And before I catch too much flaming, the antenna is not at my 
>> station. 
>> Only at a friends with somewhat limited space for wire antennas.
>>
>> 73 Jim KI7Y
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>
>   
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>