Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Question on Multiple Inverted L Antennas

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Question on Multiple Inverted L Antennas
From: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:44:43 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 Isn't an inverted L antenna just one (Unique) configuration of a top hat 
vertical?

k7puc


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "hasan schiers" <schiers@netins.net>
To: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Question on Multiple Inverted L Antennas


> Inverted L's have similar bandwidth to a 1/4 wave vertical...and it isn't
> "real broad" without excessive return loss. All measurements need to be 
> made
> at the feedpoint. I've done radial studies on my Inverted L and as radial
> numbers increase, vswr bandwidth DECREASES, exactly as it should. I made
> measurements of feedpoint Z at resonance and 2:1 vswr bandwidth with the
> following number of radials:
>
> 0,2,4,6,8,12,16,26
>
> VSWR bandwidth was best with 0 radials (DUH...lots of resistive loss!)
> Feedpoint Z dropped from 79 ohms with 0 radials to 29 ohms with 26 
> radials.
> The predicted Rrad is 25.4 ohms
>
> 73,
>
> ...hasan, N0AN

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>