Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Screw Anchor Question

To: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Screw Anchor Question
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:38:27 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Not to mention that you do not have the typical ham single-point failure risk , 
with all the guys in one plane attached to the same anchor!

73, Pete

At 08:19 AM 1/16/2006, Dennis OConnor wrote:
> I have two towers, 130' lightly loaded and 150' with LARGE antenna loads - 
> way, way beyond Rohns data for 25G...   They are installed with screw anchors 
> into sandy ground... They have been up more than ten years without any 
> incident or evidence of failure... Storms with recorded gusts to 89 mph have 
> happened over those years... In Michigan we have freeze thaw cycles up the 
> bungees...
>
>So why does it work for this clueless ham? 
>Well, ol clueless here designed and installed it so that there is a separate 
>anchor for every 60 feet of tower, i.e. only two guys per anchor... And the 
>steepest guy angle to any anchor is 45 degrees, while it's lower mate is 
>roughly 30 degrees... My suspicion is that the tower sections will bow enough 
>to gyrate and twist the tower down before the guy anchors will pull out...  
>Limiting the load to each screw by keeping the guy wire angle low, is the key 
>in my book...
>
>denny
>
>
>
>
>                        
>---------------------------------
>Yahoo! Photos
> Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>