To: | "Derek Cohn/WB0TUA" <vibroplex@mindspring.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Longer or higher? |
From: | Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:48:13 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On Feb 15, 2005, at 12:30 AM, Derek Cohn/WB0TUA wrote: Would I be better off adding wire to the antenna or having the ends higher in the air. I primarily operate 80, 40, 30, and 20 CW. Any advice? First, go higher. The single most import dimension of a horizontal antenna is the height above ground in wavelengths. For 80m, even 40 feet is pretty low. 100 feet is plenty long enough for all bands except perhaps 80m. There might be some minor benefit to going to 120-140 feet, but it could make the antenna harder to tune up on 40m. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Longer or higher?, Gary Schafer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Longer or higher?, Bill Coleman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Longer or higher?, Jim Brown |
Next by Thread: | FW: [TowerTalk] Dipole Longer or higher?, Rex Lint |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |