To: | Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>, towertalk@contesting.com,towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Dipole Longer or higher? |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:41:40 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
At 10:46 AM 2/15/2005, Bill Fuqua wrote:
Why do you think the oldtimers used ceramic insulators on both the feedline andOr put the auto tuner at the feedpoint, where it really needs to be. It won't solve the circulating reactive current problem, but it will solve the feedline loss problem. For actual numbers... Assuming a fairly skinny antenna(l/d=2000), a +/- 20% change in length(or frequency) results in a reactive component of some +/- 250-300 ohms (on top of the 30-100 ohm resistive component). The reactance/resistance of the antenna ranges from -7 to +2.35. A moderately thin dipole (l/d=1250) that's 1/4 wavelength long (total... 1/8th on each side) has an impedance of about 13-713j ohms. That's a fairly large X/R ratio, implying the circulating currents will be about 50 times the radiated current. If you assume that your matching network has a Q of say, 200, its resistance will be 713/200 or about 3.5 ohms. Combined with the self resistance of the antenna of 13 ohms, you'll lose about 20% of your power in the inductor, say, 0.7 dB? Maybe a bit more, because the antenna isn't lossless either. Jim, W6RMK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Re: Dipole Longer or higher?, Bill Fuqua |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Glastic Standoff insulators, Larry Emery |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Re: Dipole Longer or higher?, Bill Fuqua |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Glastic Standoff insulators, Larry Emery |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |