Folks:
I am trying to positively ID the tower mounted on a tower trailer that I
picked up, and I am refurbishing. The tower is 3ea 20 ft sections, nested,
slightly taller than 20 ft, and looks like a Tristao tower, (now US tower)
from the lattice work. Lattice work is flat steel diagonals, with heavy,
open channel horizontal cross members. The center to center (face)
dimensions of the corner tubes for each of 3 sections is: 24.5" 20.0", and
16.5", measured at the base of each section. Does/did Tristao attach a
nameplate to their towers? Where?
I believe the tower is an HDX 555.
The tower has two motors, (tilt up, and telescope) each with pulleys,
rubber V belt drives, reduction gearboxes, and lifting cable drums, with
1/2" lifting cable.
Tnx,
73, DX, de Pat Barthelow AA6EG
aa6eg@hotmail.com
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Reply-To: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>
To: <keith@dutson.net>, "'Frank Donovan'"
<donovanf@erols.com>,<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] There's 'ground', and then there's 'ground'
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:25:41 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from dayton.akorn.net ([216.1.128.73]) by mc3-f13.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:26:54 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by dayton.akorn.net
(Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3AC3195C8;Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dayton.akorn.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(dayton.akorn.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id
12796-01-2; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dayton.akorn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by dayton.akorn.net
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D333195AC;Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by dayton.akorn.net
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD803195AFfor <towertalk@contesting.com>; Sun, 16
Jan 2005 21:26:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dayton.akorn.net ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (dayton.akorn.net
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 12668-05 for
<towertalk@contesting.com>;Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from paris.akorn.net (paris.akorn.net [216.1.128.10])by
dayton.akorn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704E03195ACfor
<towertalk@contesting.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (paris.akorn.net [127.0.0.1])by paris.akorn.net
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 834A2F2459;Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from paris.akorn.net ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (paris.akorn.net
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 02571-07; Sun, 16 Jan
2005 21:26:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from w8ji (unknown [216.1.128.208])by paris.akorn.net (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 65C4FF2417;Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:26:13 -0500 (EST)
X-Message-Info: EoYTbT2lH2PnyGXjrCCA+YD3Ltb3R4yuM17EqatRJ6k=
X-Original-To: towertalk@contesting.com
Delivered-To: towertalk@contesting.com
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.4.2
References: <E1CqIb6-0006V1-00@pop-a065d23.pas.sa.earthlink.net>
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at akorn.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at contesting.com
X-BeenThere: towertalk@contesting.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics."
<towertalk.contesting.com>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>,<mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/towertalk>
List-Post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
List-Help: <mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>,<mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at contesting.com
Return-Path: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2005 02:26:56.0822 (UTC)
FILETIME=[03FAC560:01C4FC3C]
> However, it is empirical evidence that I am seeking. My
station ground
> system design is based on what I have found in ARRL and
other publications
> such as the technical documents provided by Polyphaser and
Harger. I found
> nothing published that spoke of the adverse effects caused
by using braided
> straps. Your posts are the only source.
Sometimes we can't easily find things that are commonly
known or understood in engineering circles. Most engineers
and many hobbyists understand skin effect, and it only takes
a moment to reason through this.
The problem with any conductor at high frequency is skin
effect "pushes" current to the outside. When the conductor
is woven, current either has to flow from inward moving
strand to a surface stand through pressure contact or suffer
a path of greatly increased impedance if it follows the
original strand inside the braid.
The typical clean copper braid with a basically parallel lay
and minor weave has perhaps four times the resistance per
unit length of a similar width smooth surfaced conductor. Of
course it varies with the braid construction and contact
resistance between strands, but that is generally for better
braid that is clean with good pressure contact between
strands.
In HF power amplifiers, I have found a good general rule of
thumb is this:
At 30 MHz is the clean braid from RG-8 cable has about the
same current carrying capacity as #14 or 16 tinned solid
buss wire.
It's quite common to have braided leads of rather large size
overheat and fail even at just several amperes at radio
frequencies.
Many construction standards prohibit braided straps in RF or
lightning paths unless the connection absolutely must have
braiding in order to withstand flexing, and then the braid
is often substantially oversized to make up for its reduced
current capacity. It's my understanding NASA restricts use
of braiding, and I can cite many cases where braiding will
either cause excessive loss or actually fail in high current
RF systems.
By the way, that permanent loss increase you see in coaxial
cables that have been wet, even after they dry back out? It
primarily comes from loss of strand contact in the weave
caused by the tarnishing of conductors.
If the Handbook tells readers braiding (especially braiding
that might be exposed to moisture) is a good idea in high
frequency or lightning grounds....they are giving bad
advice.
73 Tom
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|