To: | "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>,<towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Slopers, half slopers, (using the tower) |
From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:32:23 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
> Slopers are notoriously variable in their performance. This is because > the tower itself is fully in play, as are the antennas on it. That's why slopers worked against the tower should be called sloppers instead of slopers. They are sloppy systems that generally, if they work at all, work by good fortune rather than proper design. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Slopers, half slopers, (using the tower), Guy Olinger, K2AV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Slopers, half slopers, (using the tower), FireBrick |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Slopers, half slopers, (using the tower), Guy Olinger, K2AV |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Slopers, half slopers, (using the tower), FireBrick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |