To: | keith@dutson.net, "'TowerTalk'" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [TowerTalk] elevated short vertical dipole orquarterwave monopole? |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:44:51 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
You don't understand.. the 1000 foot tower (300 meters, actually) is to
hold up my HDTV over the air antenna so I can receive signals from Mt.
Wilson (some 20 mi to the East). There just happens to be a hill in the
way that I have to look over. I'm just glad that I can get dual use from the tower. Just slide that 200 foot vertical dipole on the top next to the HDTV panel. It's an OTARD, after all... <grin> At 02:49 PM 12/3/2004 -0600, Keith Dutson wrote: My guess is that, for your location, your chief concern with a 1000 foot tower would be right-of-way access for guy points. Close behind in second place would be FCC/FAA approval. <smile> _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting rotor on 25ag2 top section?, Pete Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [BULK] - RE: [TowerTalk] elevated short vertical dipole orquarterwave monopole?, Steve Katz |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] elevated short vertical dipole orquarterwave monopole?, Keith Dutson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] elevated short vertical dipole or quarterwavemonopole?, Al Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |