To: | stevek@jmr.com, w8ji@contesting.com, towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [TowerTalk] 8X center migration in a coax choke? |
From: | "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:22:03 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
thanks Steve, i looked at the radioworks 8X solid stuff--they say it has
same center as foam except the copper is tinned. I think the shield is
tinned also. I'm also looking at using 213. On a 16" diameter coil form
(a small garbage bucket from home depot) I calculate the L for 100' of 213
would be 192 uH. it seems to me that that would get the job done on 160,
get the feed closer to 1/2 w.l. + no worries at QRO with high swr. 73, rob/k5uj From: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com> To: 'Tom Rauch' <w8ji@contesting.com>, "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>, towertalk@contesting.com Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] 8X center migration in a coax choke? Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:08:18 -0800 > Rob, > > I use thousands of feet of the stuff and none of it is > Belden. > > I consider it cheap coax, so I'm rough on it. I have 300 ft > long hunks hanging from high dipoles (I have a 318ft tower) > and I don't worry. To keep the wind from blowing > > ::Now, that's a good trick! I wish I could stop the wind from blowing...! > -WB2WIK/6 > > > and > breaking the shield from the connector I just wrap #17 steel > wire right around the jacket tightly and tie it to a pipe > driven in the ground that supports my antenna switch. > > As for chokes.... I've been using chokes made with RG8X for > years and never had a problem regardless of power level or > stress. I use 4" maximum diameter. My 80 meter antennas have > baluns over 10 years old. The ONLY problem is the white > center insulation has powdered up where it is exposed to GA > sunlight. I cut one back a few weeks ago until I got to new > foam. This time I wrapped the foam in coax seal. > > ::As for solid-dielectric RG8X type cable, Radioworks is now selling > precisely that; advertised as "Super RG8X." This design change obviously > violates the original RG8X "spec," it would have to with a solid > dielectric. To maintain 50 Ohms Zo, they'd have to either make the center > conductor smaller gauge, or change the cable diameter; not sure which they > did, but I'd guess they decreased the center conductor gauge to maintain > the same cable O.D. and still hit 50 Ohms. If so, the "new Super RG8X" > probably has a higher DWV (voltage) rating, but may actually have more > loss, and a lower power handling ability, since most of the loss in coax > is the skin resistance of the center conductor, and if you make that > smaller, you're going in the wrong direction. Anyway, you might want to > look into this on the Radioworks website. -WB2WIK/6 > > > _________________________________________________________________ Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 80m 4Square Comtek box, R. Kevin Stover |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 80m 4Square Comtek box, Yo3ctk |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] 8X center migration in a coax choke?, Jim Lux |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] ICE Suppressor Placement?, Pat Chiles |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |