Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax question

To: "Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax question
From: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: keith@dutson.net
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:42:48 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I'll take a stab at this question.  Certain to be corrected if in error.
<grin>

Two reasons come to mind.
1. Since RF travels on the inside of the shield, there is less chance for
some to leak out; i.e. lower loss.
2. There is less chance for external RF to interfere with reception.

Keith NM5G

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom Rauch
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:10 PM
To: Steve Katz; 'Bob'; Tower (K8RI); Alan C. Zack
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com; kk9a@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax question

> An advantage of LMR-400 or any similarly constructed cable
is that it's
> double shielded, and literally 100% shielded by the inner
foil shield.

Why is that important?


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>