To: | Jamesnf@aol.com, k1ttt@arrl.net, alwilliams@olywa.net,TOWERTALK@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] loax 'sweet lenght' |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:54:50 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
At 01:59 PM 10/11/2004 -0400, Jamesnf@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 10/11/2004 11:14:29 AM Central Standard Time, k1ttt@arrl.net writes: > Because there is no reactance at the antenna, I presume there is no > reactance at the transmitter end regardless of line length? It's a bit unclear what you said here. I think the correct statement is: If the line is matched to the load (the antenna), AND there is no reactive component at the load, then the length of the line makes no difference: at no distance is there a reactive component in the impedance looking into the line. However, if there is a mismatch at the load (even if the load is resistive), then you can get a reactive component at the other end of the line. Practical examples: A good example is tuning stubs using shorted or open transmission lines, which are heavily used in microwave design. The short or open is a non-reactive termination. One could use a resistive (but mismatched) termination with a variable length line to create a mismatch with varying phase, but constant VSWR. This is often used in load-pull testing for microwave amplifiers, some of which might not be stable with reflected power of the wrong phase. Likewise, you'd use a similar test setup for "source-pull" , where you want to optimize things like NF, and you have to work with a possibly mismatched source, but where the mismatch is guaranteed (by design) to be no worse than, say, 1.2:1, but of unknown phase. And, of course, the known mismatch at the end of a known transmission line is a handy way to calibrate your antenna analyzer. I have a set of 25 and 100 ohm terminations for just this sort of thing. Sometime, when I get around to it, I'm going to design some impedance matched "T"s that can be used to combine standard 50 ohm terminations in a variety of configurations. A T and a couple 50s makes a nice 25. It's the 100 ohm termination that's a bit trickier. And, it would be nice to have some other values to test with (i.e. 33.33 ohms), although, a good collection of 1,2,3,6, and 10 dB pads can serve. Jim, W6RMK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Replacing coax, Tom Martin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TowerTalk] Replacing coax, Keith Dutson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] loax 'sweet lenght', Tom Rauch |
Next by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] loax 'sweet lenght', Daly, Greg TQO |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |