To: | "John Tait" <bravo@iol.ie>, <jsb@digistar.com>,<towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] CobWebb antennas - success stories? |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:26:09 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
At 11:45 PM 9/22/2004 +0100, John Tait wrote:Anyone have any success stories regarding the CobWebb antenna? I don't think they're folded, just wrapped. A folded dipole doesn't change the bandwidth, just transforms the impedance (which would be nice in this case, since it would transform the 10-12 ohms of the dipole in a square up to 40-50 ohms..). You'd still have the efficiency and bandwidth problems though. Can't get around that physical size Chu-Harrington thing. Sure a lot easier to tune up in design, too, since all the ends that need trimming are all in the same place. An autotuner and this beast might be a good combo. Then the narrow band nature wouldn't be as big a deal. X varies from about -20j to +30j (on top of a 11-12 ohm R) over 14.0-14.5 MHz.. 3.5:1 VSWR range 14.050 - 14.350 _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TowerTalk] Concrete anchors, Dino Darling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] CobWebb antennas - success stories?, Jim Lux |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] CobWebb antennas - success stories?, John Tait |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] CobWebb antennas - success stories?, Jim Lux |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |