Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls.. they work

To: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls.. they work
From: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:33:54 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Yeah that was good!   Then there is also that G.W. Bush classic statement
that   Trees cause air pollution!
Another in a long-series of presidential "head-shakers".

I won't bother to include any of his "infamous" statements on BPL since we
all know them.
I wonder what he would say about ham radio and radio towers?

Bob KQ2M

> >How does NASA define "safe"? How does NASA define "works"?
>
> LOL!  Can't help but think of Bill Clinton and his infamous definition
> statement regarding Monica.
>
> Keith
>
>   _____
>
> From: david jordan [mailto:wa3gin@erols.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 10:45 AM
> To: Tom Rauch
> Cc: keith@dutson.net; TowerTalk
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls.. they work
>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> It all depends on how one defines "works"!  One could ask the same
question
> of tooth paste, chlorinated water, bacterial hand washing soap, vitamins,
> cancer treatments, and most other products.
>
> How can lightning risk management be anything more than subjective views
and
> marketing?  My personal view is if mother nature wants to screw with
> anything man made mother nature will have her way with ease. Regarding
NASA,
> they bought the devices. They must have thought they would work when they
> purchased the devices. Did NASA get snookered?  Maybe! Maybe their
> expectations were marketed. Reducing the risk and eliminating the risk are
> two very different things.
> Also I seem to remember NASA saying on numerous occasions that the space
> shuttle was safe, usually after each massive failure in safety.  How does
> NASA define "safe"? How does NASA define "works"?  I think the discussion
is
> beating a dead horse at this point. It's not black or white in my view
with
> regard to the effectiveness of methods designed to reduce the risk of
> occurrences that may lead to a direct lightning strike.
>
> The spider balls concept is a fascinating one.  I'm sure there are at
least
> two strong opinions on whether they things "work" or not, depending on
your
> definition.
>
> Only the creator of the planet knows for sure, and he/she might decide
that
> just to make it interesting the damn things will work some of the time but
> not all of the time!
>
> 73,
> dave
> wa3gin


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>