Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls

To: keith@dutson.net
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls
From: k2qmf@juno.com
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:17:04 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hello All,

Just how many male spiders would you need
to make one of these things???

Thanks for the info and 73,  Ted  K2QMF

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:55:56 -0500 "Keith Dutson"
<kjdutson@earthlink.net> writes:
> This whole thread on bleeding off charges from clouds has been 
> interesting,
> educational and entertaining to me.  In my case, I cannot image this 
> bleed
> theory has any relevance at all.  But others seem to think it is a 
> way to
> avoid damage.  To each their own.
>  
> At my QTH in Tomball, Texas (25 miles NW of Houston), there have 
> been five
> observed strikes on the single 150 foot tower located near the 
> center of the
> property.  The tower went up in 1999.  The property is approximately 
> 16
> acres, about 850 feet square, and flat as a pancake.  It is one 
> parcel out
> of a 100 acre farm that was active until the farmer passed away 
> about 40
> years ago.  Soil is sandy loam down to 3 or 4 feet, then iron ore 
> for many
> more feet (have dug to 20 feet so far).  There are about 50 large 
> pine trees
> scattered about and another 100 or so live oak trees planted in 
> 1985.  The
> tract was purchased in 1977.
>  
> Lightning has been a frequent visitor to this site.  Before the 
> tower was
> erected ten pines were hit and killed.  Since the tower went up not 
> a single
> tree has been hit.  So, apparently the 150 foot tower has protected 
> the
> average 80 foot trees quite well - so far.
>  
> Storms here with lightning are fast and furious.  Dark clouds can 
> seemingly
> appear out of nowhere.  There is likely not a spot for miles around 
> that has
> never been struck by a bolt.  In fact, I assume that when the next 
> two
> towers go up, it will be an invitation for more strikes.
>  
> Up until the last two strikes, I never lost a single piece of 
> equipment.  I
> felt smug in the ground system design and implementation.  All 
> ground rods
> were connected in a single point.  What changed my luck was when we
> remodeled the house two years ago and connected to the shack 
> (separate
> building with separate AC power lines) with telephone, TV (satellite) 
> and
> computer LAN.  The last two strikes killed all phones, everything on 
> the
> LAN, and TV service in the shack.  I thought the first strike was a 
> fluke.
> Now I realize that these connections are the problem.  The LAN cable 
> has
> been removed and will soon be replaced with wireless router.  The TV 
> and
> telephone lines will remain, but will be properly grounded at the 
> entry
> panel.
>  
> Keith
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: Jerry Keller [mailto:k3bz@arrl.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:04 PM
> To: keith@dutson.net; 'TowerTalk'
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] spider balls
> 
> 
> Those are pretty big assumptions. Since there are so many variables, 
> and
> they likely vary so widely, I doubt the chances that any particular 
> set of
> assumptions can represent a "typical" strike for the purposes of 
> discussion
> or analysis. I see what you're getting at, but I doubt that 
> lightning
> phenomena can yet be defined in terms that would allow predictive
> description. We might get close, but not close enough.
>  
> You're also assuming that the static build-up happens in a very 
> short time,
> immediately prior to the strike. What if the ground potential 
> sometimes
> "bleeds" off more slowly (or in a relatively long time, as it 
> accumulates)
> so that the potential doesn't rise to the strike level?
>  
> The phenomena over their antenna fields, described by John, W0UN and 
> Don,
> VE6JY, as viewed by them from vantage points where they can see the 
> storms
> come and go, cannot be dismissed simply because they seem 
> inconsistent with
> current theory.
>  
> 73, Jerry K3BZ
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Keith  <mailto:kjdutson@earthlink.net> Dutson 
> To: 'TowerTalk' <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>  
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] spider balls
> 
> There is little doubt that porcupines will help bleed off static 
> charges
> better than nothing at all.  However, a lightning strike has little 
> to do
> with static charge bleed off.  Instead, a strike is the result of 
> the
> buildup of a huge potential in rapid succession (a matter of seconds 
> in many
> cases).  Assume that a bolt of lightning originates from a height of 
> 1000
> feet and is going to ground rather than horizontal within the cloud. 
>  Also
> assume the potential must be about 20KV to jump an inch.  The 1000 
> foot arc
> would require a minimum potential of approximately 240 million 
> volts
> (1K*12*20K).  Can you imagine what would happen if the little 
> porcupine ball
> were to bleed off just 10 percent of this potential to avoid a 
> strike?  Can
> you say vaporization? <grin>
> 
> Keith
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Dietz 
> W5PR
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:29 PM
> To: 'Towertalk Reflector'
> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] spider balls
> 
> If you have ever heard the static buildup on big antennas when a 
> storm is
> nearby, it will make you a believer that the porcupines might work.  
> I have
> no empirical evidence, but how can it HURT???
> 
> Chuck W5PR
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", 
> "Wireless
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 
> with any
> questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", 
> "Wireless
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 
> with any
> questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", 
> "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 
> 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>