To: | towertalk reflector <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Tower/mast/antenna height -- a clarification |
From: | Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net> |
Date: | Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:20:44 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
The wording in my original message was my own. The relevant section of
the ordinance is: "Sec. 3A.04 Applicability. A. New towers and antennas. All new towers and new antennas in the township shall be subject to this article, except as otherwise provided in this section. B. Amateur radio station operators/receive only antennas; television antennas. This article shall not govern any tower, or the installation of any antenna: (i) That is under seventy (70) feet in height; and (ii) Is owned and operated by a federally-licensed amateur radio station or is used exclusively for receive only antennas for voice or television reception." I take this to mean that no part of the installation may be more than 70' above grade. Alan AB2OS On 07/21/04 11:48 pm Jim Jarvis put fingers to keyboard and launched the following message into cyberspace: _______________________________________________I obviously missed the central point of this post, and responded to mast vs. tower cost/weight discussion. See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Towerheight, Jim Jarvis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Towerheight, Tower (K8RI) |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Towerheight, Jim Jarvis |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tower/mast/antenna height -- a clarification, Richard M. Gillingham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |