Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed?
From: "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:57:13 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
If you look at Mosley's website (http://www.mosley-electronics.com/faq.htm),
they clearly use their split-dipole direct-feed approach as a marketing
strategy -- simplicity, stability, etc. But any radiator fed in the center with
an unbalanced transmission line is going to produce common-mode currents on the
transmission line. That's agiven. The bottom-line question is whether this is a
"big deal" or "not a big deal".

In my experience, coax common-mode currents are a big deal if they cause actual
problems with loading, RF in the shack, pattern distortion, etc. Otherwise, for
practical purposes, probably not. In any case, however, putting a choke balun in
the transmission line won't produce any untoward side-effects (loss or
attenuation) and I would do it as a matter of course, as you did. There are also
other ways to choke off common-mode currents, all detailed in the aforementioned
Antenna Book, and you can take your choice. My philosophy is simple: We know
that common-mode currents on the coax CAN cause problems -- and since it's so
easy to prevent this, why not do it?

Bill / W5WVO


Bob Allen wrote:
> Hi,
> We were working on our 2 Field Day antennas and the question came up
> about choke baluns and
> whether they are needed on this antenna.
> The manufacturer say no but Cushcraft's instructions for one of their
> tri-banders of similar
> construction and frequency says to make a choke balun by wrapping
> coax in a 6" circle 8 turns.
> Given that and the assumption that the coax hitched direct could have
> problems with common mode
> currents as described in the ARRL Antenna Book 19th ed. sec.26 pg. 16
> we use choke baluns as
> described above.
> The question is: are we doing anything that might stand out as
> particularly wrong in the sense
> of signal loss or maybe SWR issues though these antennas tune fine
> like this (except when we get
> the dipoles too close)?
> We feed these with rg-8
>
> Bob
> KB1FRW
> 73
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers",
> "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free,
> 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>