To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] 40m beam / interactions |
From: | corneliuspaul@gmx.net |
Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:00:55 +0200 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Hello, if you are talking about interactions between 40m and higher bands (15m is worst, 20m is much less affected, 10m is no problem most of the times), in my opinion it is not important which brand of 40m antenna you buy. It is the simple laws of physics (2nd harmonic, 3rd harmonic, etc.), has nothing to do with any brand. when talking about the highband beam, things might be a bit different. Depending on the type of design (heavily or loosely coupled parasitic elements, traps or no traps, all driven (lpda) or yagi/uda style) one design will react more critical to nearby objects (antennas or other metallic objects) while others might be more tolerant. At least that is how I understand it. 73, Con DF4SA At 12:30 16.04.2004, you wrote: Interaction was my concern too when selecting a 40M beam since it would be on the same mast as a tribander. I decided on the Force 12 MAG240N since it doesn't have a resonance in any other band. Went together easy. Followed the instructions for tuning each element. Seems to work fine. N2TK, Tony _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TowerTalk] 40m beam, N2TK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40m beam, Grillo's |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] 40m beam, N2TK |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40m beam / interactions, David Hachadorian |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |