To: | "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>,"TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] CC&Rs |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:15:42 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
At 06:46 PM 3/25/2004 -0700, Bill VanAlstyne wrote:
Jim Lux wrote: Yikes indeed... I'm no legal expert, but, theoretically, there are legal mechanisms to restrict the tyranny of the majority in just such cases (which is probably why there are always all those "grandfather" clauses.. easier to accomodate than fight). For instance, the common area group couldn't pass a rule that prevents you from driving into your driveway, or, that requires you to burn your house down. Such things are considered to be "not in the public interest". The real problem is that it's theoretical.. you still have to pay an attorney to slug it out in court, and it's unlikely that there is some agreement that "loser pays fees". _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] CC&Rs, Bill VanAlstyne |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Quarterly, semi-annual, and annual preventative maintenance checklist..., Chris Hale |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] CC&Rs, Bill VanAlstyne |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] CC&Rs, Jim Miller |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |