Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>, "Didier Juges" <didier@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection
From: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:43:15 +0100
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
  Just wonder what the Dutch PA PI & PE think about this.
  They often live below see level.

  Jos

  -____________________________________________________-

  __---- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Didier Juges" <didier@cox.net>
  To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
  Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 4:22 PM
  Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection


  > Good point. At higher altitude, the dielectric strength of air is less,
so
  > the voltage cannot build up as much before the strike starts, so the
clouds
  > cannot build as much energy as they can in Florida.
  >
  > 73,
  > Didier KO4BB
  >
  > At 07:41 AM 3/22/2004, you wrote:
  > > From personal experience there is a lot of lightning in CO,
  > >but the intensity is somewhat less since the ground elevation
  > >is at 5,000 ft so the storms have 5,000 ft less elevation to
  > >develop their charge.
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  >
  > See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > TowerTalk mailing list
  > TowerTalk@contesting.com
  > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
  >


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>