Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise

To: "Tim Makins, EI8IC" <contesting@eircom.net>,"Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise
From: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:13 -1000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hi,  ref questions about elevated dipoles:


> I wonder what the difference is, at those heights, between
> a GP as you describe, and a vertical dipole ? Seems to me
> that if you take half a standard dipole for the top bit, and
> half a fan dipole for the bottom bit, you've really got an
> elevated GP...

Here is an excellent photo of exactly the sort of antenna you
describe:

http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/images/radiostations/
wwvh-large/wwvh5.jpg


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>